Boulder Society For Scientific Exploration Presentation On Unified Physics 2024 Otter Ai

Adam Apollo How do we get the forces that make up the standard model of physics that's present in our academia, and what do we know about those forces, and what do we understand about them? And through this presentation, I'm going to show you how these fundamental forces can arise spontaneously and classically from quantum field, lattice dynamics. This is really a talk that puts a new kind of foundation and substantiation around our understanding of the quantum vacuum, which is not a vacuum at all. It's a planet. It's full of energy, and that's been known for a very long time. But we're going to discuss how that energy is actually there, how it exists, why it's not exploding out of every empty space around us all the time, and yet, how very simple mechanics within that structure, when we start to really geometrically analyze it, looking at its warp and weave the wave forms inside of it. How is it structured? That we begin to see exactly how every single force arises from that and how all of physics can be unified. And I'm going to give you lots and lots and lots of you know, baseline foundation to approach these ideas and this thinking for yourselves, and I'm going to do most of that without a bunch of equations, but I do have papers on these topics that I'm working to get peer reviewed and published this year, later this year, so stay tuned for those,

and if you're interested, I'll make sure those Get out to the mailing list for the Society for scientific exploration, so you can see more of the equation work and the math, and there will be some of that, but I promise you, I'm going to keep the math pretty light for this talk. Does that sound good to you? Okay, great. I had a feeling that might be important. So let's start out this talk with gaining a little bit of perspective, because a lot of this comes down to understanding size and scale and the phenomena at different scales. So we take a woman, we take her hair, we get down into a single hair. We get down into single cells of a hair. We get into the microfibrils inside of that, and the protofibrils inside of that, the keratin inside of that, roll our way down to the carbon and hydrogen and oxygen, and eventually we get down to the electron orbitals. And finally, way down inside of there, we get to the core of the atom, and what we end up with is essentially this model of a proton. Now you'll notice a very interesting thing as we went through all of these layers. You know, you can kind of see a natural progression of structure, right until you get to the end. At the very end, you've got a circle they call a proton. What do they do? They just stick these three balls in

it. Now, I want to talk about these three balls, because these three balls are very fascinating and interesting and form the foundation of essentially the core of what became the Standard Model of particle physics. Right? We have essentially what we call two up quarks and a down quark, and these things are held together by, you know, some amalgamation of force carrier particles we sometimes call gluons, because we like the idea that they're kind of glued together. And these, of course, are contained inside of the proton. And how do we know that they're contained inside of the proton? How do we think that they're contained inside of the proton will we take an accelerator and we smash two protons together as fast as we possibly can, and this is what comes out, Right? And from that, essentially what we see is three major jets, three major emission jets. Now obviously that's not all that's coming out of the proton is there, but we see three major jets. Two of them have a tendency to curve in one direction on the little you know photographic plate, one of them tends to curve the other direction. And so what do we call them? Up quarks and down quarks? Right? Now, nobody really mentions to you, when you hear about this, or you learn about this in physics, that quarks, they're considered fundamental particles, right? These are considered to be the most fundamental structures of the universe, right? But

they don't tell you that quarks are never found in isolation by themselves, just existing. Why? Don't quarks exist normally outside of a proton. Well, we have to explain that. So we come up with this idea called Color confinement. They only can exist with each other and inside the proton. Okay, that's a little bit of an interesting leap, right? And how do they stay together? Well, we don't know. So we called it the color force, and we assigned an arbitrary amount to the value of the general containment that we perceive to be happening. Okay, are you getting what I'm getting at here? There's not a lot of really strong foundations there is there, and yet, this is the foundation of particle physics. And most of the map of the particles in particle physics emerged from experiments like this. You smash together some stuff, you see a ton of things going on, and you make some theoretical assessments and predictions. Maybe, if it's this kind of atom that we're smashing or this kind of proton that we're smashing, we're going to get a heavier jet. And if that turns out to be true, then maybe that's a new kind of particle. Okay, so what you have is experiments where you've got $10 billion a year going to find the Higgs boson. And what do they do? They need to find the Higgs boson. So what do you do? You smash together two protons, and we're like, look

at those. Those must be bottom quark jets. And there's an electron and a positron there. Wait, bottom quark jets. Those move different from the other Quark jets that we see. It's got to be the Higgs boson, right? And I just want to frame up Higgs Boson for a moment too. You guys know about Peter Higgs and Higgs boson in the Higgs field, right? Well, Peter Higgs, you know, had this really interesting idea that there's got to be some way that particles get mass, right? Because, as of right now, particles are kind of an abstract idea. I mean, when you talk about an electron, what is it? It's a point particle with zero size. Does that make any sense at all? It's a zero size point, right? And yet it has charge, it has carry so all the sudden, we're realizing fields and forces become more important in a lot of areas, and that's where we're going to, you know? That's that's kind of like the hint. So when you have the Higgs boson, what do you also have? You have the Higgs field. And Peter Higgs was like, Well, how does all the you know, mask? Where does it come from? We have to have some super powerful, all consuming field that gives rise to mass. Well, I don't know whether he just never read philosophy in his entire life, or had no idea about the history of physics, but it turns out there's something

that's already planned to do this quite well, and it's called the ether, right? And it's been around a long time, and we're going to talk about that. But you know, the the idea that there's this fundamental thing that you can't find unless you smash two things together, and you are maybe going to get a tiny glimpse of this, something that somehow spontaneously gives rise to everything in all mass and all energy, guys, we can do better than that in science. Okay, and so let's talk about the strong interaction. This is another really interesting one. So of the four fundamental forces you have gravity, electromagnetism, the strong force and the weak force. Right now, what is the strong force? Well, we were wondering how it is that you can have protons together in a nucleus of an atom and that they stay together. I mean, if they're positively charged, right? And then, of course, we think of neutrons, and we're like, okay, so it's protons and neutrons, but there's no negative in there. So how do they stay together and not just fly apart? Well, there's some force that's strong enough to do that, and let's see if we break them apart. We know it's this hard to break apart, and we know the force falls off this fast from this amount of distance. So we have a general idea of the strength of this force and the curve of its fall off, called the Yukawa

potential. And what do we call it? We'll just call it the strong force. But nobody ever is like, well, what is it? Right? There is no, what is it? It's just, this is the map of the experimentation, and this is what we're going to call it. So I think that's pretty interesting. And you know, when you get to into these diagrams and the way that the strong force and force exchanges. Work. I mean, it's pretty primitive stuff. It's like, okay, maybe we're super sophisticated, or maybe we're just pretending we're really sophisticated and figuring it out as we go along. Probably more likely, isn't that just the academic world for you? Well, I know for sure, but if I postulated that the pyramids were built, then of course, they would have had to be built by slaves, because at what point we had lots of slaves in my own plantation. And therefore I know that it's possible these great, strong, burly men must have been able to haul 100 ton stones, hundreds of miles easily, no problem. Put a little wit crap. I'll do it right away. Build that Great Pyramid. Just trust me, that's, this is absolutely a scientific observation, right? I mean, I'm messing with them, but you guys get it, you know, thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Okay, so here we have the strong interaction. But is it a strong force, or is it actually just gravity? You know, my good friend,

missim Herman, has been a good friend off and on. I'll just say there's this, you know, interesting curve that comes when you treat a proton as a miniature black hole, and you acknowledge that this little proton could be curved space time. And as we'll talk about a lot more, what we know about gravity is that gravity is curved space time. That's all it is, right? So if you have a proton and it's space time that's curved at that size, you get this little tiny bundle, and you get some really interesting properties to that. Now, I'm not going to get into his whole work on that. There's a paper called the Schwarzschild proton. I highly recommend checking it out. But it's a very compelling argument, because essentially, if you treat the proton as a little miniature black hole, and its charge radius is its event horizon to the black hole, and that little black hole happens to be spinning at c on its horizon. Now, by the way, Miss sim didn't quite get this, and I'll show you some more details about this later, but he says the surface spins at sea. Well, on any sphere, the whole surface will never spin at the same speed. So I modified this, this postulation, to suggest that it is the equator spinning at sea. And this gives rise to a lot of really interesting stuff I'm going to get into later. But essentially, if the equator is spinning

at C, what you have is mass dilation and time dilation, by the way, right, but you're not getting the standard, kind of normal approach to mass dilation, whereas, if I speed up going this direction, running through space time, you know, or hit the gas in my car, I'm feeling the push of my body against the structure of space, right? And so when you accelerate in any vector direction, then you are contracting space time. You are causing a condensation of space, and you're causing mass and time dilation. This is one of the issues with star travel, so to speak. If you really try to accelerate up to the speed of light, you're going to dilate a bunch of time, OK. But in this case, the proton is rotating, OK, so it's a centripetal force structure. Okay, so the the rotation is going to cause it instead, to contain its own mass time dilation inside the structure and create a shearing with the surrounding space time, which I'll get into. But this is just introducing the concept. And if you look at what happens, if you treat the proton as gravity, like as a field creating a gravitational force with a little miniature black hole, and it's creating this dilation, you look at the fall off due to that spin, the fall off that's caused by that mass dilation it's creating, what you end up with is the same gravitational curve as the Yukawa potential, which is

the strong force. Okay? So I think this pretty foundationally lays the grounds for the fact that the strong force is not necessary at all, that it's actually just gravity. Okay? And we're going to go a lot more in depth into there, because, let's be clear, what we're dealing with is actually a pretty freaking sophisticated and amazing thing. Okay, particle modeling can't account for all the dynamics of a Hadron, or proton, as we call them, and its destruction. We can't just understand that, you know, three jets coming out of a. 1000 is going to describe the nature of this highly complex thing, which, by the way, it's the nucleus of these atoms. These protons never decay, right? Let's keep that in mind too, as we go forward, that a proton is thought to last four lifetimes of our current universe. In other words, we have no idea. In other words, they never decay. This is the most sustainable object in the entire universe. And yet it's not fundamental the proton. Come on. So if we're going to understand all matter, and we're going to understand the physics of space, time, and we want to understand reality, we need to understand the proton. So enter the search for quantum gravity, and essentially the tangled mess of trying to get to a unified theory, we look at the proton, and we essentially look at this structure as a little miniature black hole rotating at the speed of light

around the equator. One thing becomes really, really clear, and as I unpack this, you're going to see how this begins to influence our understanding of all the other forces. And essentially that is that even though there may be shearing mass and time dilation, that would cause a great reduction of the influence of this object spin at its equator, because it's traveling C at the equator. So it's acting like light at the equator. It is not going C as you go down towards the polar axis, which means you're going to have an increase of torsion effects. This is how you get the vortex, the Whirlpool around the proton, that is the electron field. Okay? So that's what we're going to get to now, you know, Einstein and those guys, he solved the physics of big interstellar objects, or in Heisenberg solve the physics of the small stuff, you know? And really, what we're getting at is that general and special relativity helped us to see and understand some really critical principles about large scale structures and observable mechanics of the stars in the universe. But Bohr and Heisenberg and those guys, they helped us understand some of the deeper mechanics that are not so visible to us, what's really going on at the very, very small scales, but physics has had a huge, huge problem, which is that these two things have been essentially incompatible with the math and the physics of the quantum mechanics never

has worked with special and general relativity, right? They do not equate each other. Do they not work together? And that has made for a serious issue, because physics has essentially been divided by the big and the small. And if we want to unify physics and we want to bring our understanding back together, we got to understand a little bit of physics history, and we got to ask really hard questions, like, what is space time, and what are we made of? What is all of this about? So some of you may have seen some my presentations where I talk about some of this, and I'm going to run through this little historical narrative about physics for you, just to catch you up and to make sure we're all really on the same page. So back in the day, before there were physicists, there were philosophers, and philosophers were looking at the universe, and they were using intuition, and they were using their relationship to nature as a study of what is. And they had this thing in Western philosophy called the ether, right, and in our understanding of this ether, we saw that the ether would give rise to the fire, the air, the earth and the water, and that the ether was the thing that could give mass and substance to different kinds of forces, even Rene Descartes, you know, who is very, very well known for his essential work describing all life as automatons,

and that animals are essentially automata, in other words, machines. And the only thing that gives life to anything is a soul entering it, right, you know, and also for enlightenment and the idea that we are the source of our own truth in the universe. Well, Descartes also did these incredible ether maps of stellar systems, and he started to see that there could be gravitate this fields. They didn't have gravity, by the way, sorry. He started to see that there was fields of the ether around planets and stars and things, and that these fields could determine how stuff was moving inside. There. This is nobody really talks about this. Nobody realizes to car was literally doing gravitational mapping work. You know, way before there was gravity, right before there was this full Newtonian idea. So, and if we look back at the history of the ether, you've got the ka ba and AK, you've got the MaHA Buddha and Hinduism, you've got the wujing and Chinese the ether is Greek, of course, quintessence, as it was known in medieval days, etc, etc, etc. And obviously became known as the luminiferous ether from the period of the 1600s because as we took the ether and fire, air, earth, water, and we started solving stuff. Fire stuff became thermodynamics, air stuff become aerodynamics, water stuff became hydrodynamics, Earth stuff became geo dynamics. So what was left, that's not explained, was light, and so ether became known as the

medium through which light was traveling, and how light propagates through the universe. Very important to understand this. It's also very important to understand that while, you know, in our modern, sort of new agey era, we're like, physics has to eventually incorporate consciousness. Well, guess what? Before there was even physicists, physics incorporated consciousness, right? Consciousness was there from the beginning, because the understanding of the ether was that you are part of this, your chi, your key, your prana, you know, depending on where in the world you're from, otic force, bio field, human energy field, space. It's your life force. It is part of the living force of existence, which has a little different tone to it than a simulation, right? A little different tone to it than it's all a mechanical robot populated by nothing, and it means it's all artificial, right? It's all just artificial. No, no, the whole thing is intelligent. The whole thing is consciousness, perhaps. Okay, we're not going to go all the way there yet, though. And of course, there's problems with the ether, because for the Christian church in particular, when you talk about the ether, it sounds like you're talking about God. And if you're talking about God, then you're crossing into church territory. And if you're crossing into church territory, boy, you're you know, there's a reason why Newton didn't let anybody know that he was an alchemist. He was secretly an alchemist, because he would have got

killed. And essentially, you've got two guys, Mickelson and Morley. They've got this super famous experiment, which is like the dumbest experiment of all time, which is that let's take a table top right, imagine this table right here, and let's put a little laser array on this table. Or you could even use this as you're like, you know, light array. And let's see if we can detect on this table top the movement of the earth hurtling through space, because it's got to be passing through the ether, right? This was their experiment. You guys familiar with this? Okay, isn't it interesting that they never thought that maybe on the surface of the Earth and its atmosphere and the space around it, the ether is the thing that's moving. So we're moving with the ether right now. It's funny, because Flat Earthers have the same problem. They have this weird idea that if we're on a spherical Earth and we're traveling 1000 miles an hour just in the rotation of the planet towards the east that we should be feeling all these forces. They're like, Yeah, well, would the water just fly off the earth? And I'm like, No, dude, it's called gravity, right? And and so no, the whole atmosphere, the whole structure, is all co moving 1000 miles in that direction just from the rotation. And then if you account for our hurtling around the sun, you're talking about another 64,000 ish miles per hour that

we're hurtling through space. But Mickelson and Morley never thought about the fact that maybe the earth its atmosphere and all the space around it, including the moon, that entire gravitational well, is a co moving field of the ether, okay, a co moving field of the quantum vacuum. And then finally, in 1905 you have Einstein, special relativity. Einstein figures out how you can study how light moves without using a description of the ether, and Speaker 1 voila, congratulations, the death of the ether. Whoa, Adam Apollo so long, and thanks for all the space. But then 10 years later, you've got Einstein publishing, General. Relativity and general relativity says that space time is more fundamental than light, and curvature in space time can bend light right. And his teacher, Lorenz, looks at him, and he's like, oui Einstein, you know, you just proved the ether exists. And Einstein's like, Oh, my God, you're right. I did. It's back. And so Einstein, in 1920 publishes a paper called ether and relativity, and I think I can play a little bit of a clip here for you. Speaker 2 Einstein who in 19 Einstein, who in 1920 said the argument Unknown Speaker of the Easter hydroxychus Speaker 2 Einstein, who in 19 Einstein, who in 1920 said the argument of the Easter Speaker 3 the ether, to deny that Lisa ultimately assumes that empty space is not physical qualities whatsoever. The fundamental facts of mechanics do not harmonize with

this view the general theory endowed space is endowed with physical qualities. In that sense, therefore, yes, exists, according to the general theory, space without ether is unsinkable. Without Adam Apollo ether is unthinkable. Einstein, has anybody heard that quote before? I mean, really like, why was that never taught in college physics? Like, what really happened was this paper was censored. You can still find it online. There's still a couple universities that serve it up, and I'm hoping more will, and I've, of course, archived it myself out of fear that it's just going to vanish one day. But essentially, he says, Look, space has mechanical properties. And of course, it wasn't very long after that that we were realizing, whoa, space has a lot of mechanical properties, and they're very powerful properties. In fact, if we look at what's going on in quantum mechanics and we start unpacking this, what we end up is with this idea of a vacuum catastrophe, literally that there, there is should be, theoretically based on just the amount of wave forms within any region of space, just the amount of energy that's in that empty, so called space that there should be, literally, 10 to the 120 times more energy than the amount that we're observing on a daily basis. Whoa, that's a problem. And literally, this is called the worst prediction in the history of physics. But nobody's been ever, ever able to get rid of it, because it's still

there. The energy still is there. We're still running into things with it all the time, whenever we do quantum mechanical equations, whenever we do, you know, particle predictions, etc. And as early as 1968 this guy, zeldovich, he proposed this very, very massive, high energy vacuum, 10 to the 108 joules per meter squared. Now that's a 10 with 108 zeros after it guys. Just to give you like perspective, in case you're not catching the numbers here, and that compared to the prior estimate of 10 to the negative 15 joules per meter is ridiculous. I mean, it's a massive, massive difference. And then essentially, we get into the modern quantum chromodynamics and electrodynamics, and the acceptable number is 10 to the 100 and 13th joules per cubic meter. That's acceptable. That is consistent with Lorenz covariance and the Planck constant, and it's also ended up with the cosmological constant problem, because we know that something's moving and expanding and growing, and there's energy in the universe, and it's like, but where is it and how is it, and how much is it, and where the frick is it coming from? So guys have been trying to solve this issue as well as trying to solve the macro and the micro issue, the two pieces to pull together physics, and we ended up essentially coming down this pipeline into two different major directions. One is string theory, and the other one is loop quantum gravity. These were the

two biggest contenders for quite some time around a unified theory. Now, the great thing about string theory is that if you're a musician, you love this vision, because everything's vibrated, you know, like, everything is music, man, you know what I'm talking about. It's all vibratory fields. You know what I'm saying, like the. Musicians love string theory, but the problem with string theory is that in order to account for the forces and to account for gravity, how do you do it? You just add more dimensions. If you can't solve it with four dimensions, you add five. If you can't solve it with five dimensions, you add six. You can't solve it with six, you add seven, and eventually by adding up to 12 dimensions, they were finally able to account for how things were going on. But the way the picture ends up looking is that you end up with these little, tiny, bundled universes, you know, collapsed dimensional fields containing ridiculous amounts of everything and whatever, but they're just hidden in a different dimension. But the problem with that is you can't verify that. You can't experiment with that, and unfortunately, the math is so abstract, it's not giving us any grounds to do anything practical with it. Now on the other side, you've got Lee Smolin and the loop quantum gravity team. And these guys were basically looking at space time as a structure. The empty space is a structural field, and the structural

field has quantum threads connecting different nodes inside the structure, right? But the problem with loop quantum gravity is that they don't know what the structure is. Lee Smolin, these guys posted, published these papers in the 80s. I read his book, three roads to quantum gravity in 1997 and I was working on my massive project in high school of solving all the problems in the entire universe. At the same time, which I ended up calling as my senior project, the unification of science and spirituality through unified field theoretics. It was quite a quite a publication. I'll show it to you in a minute. But essentially, these guys do not know what the geometry is, so they just came up with this, like, Well, maybe it's kind of a quantum foamy thing, and it's this foamy, like, randomized geometry, Dilly doing its thing right? And they were never able to get to a clear definition, a description of that, though they're quantum gravity equations. When you treat space, time as a structure. That works. It works. You can actually start to see a structure curving, making gravity. They just couldn't get to the rest of the solution. And for me as a high school kid, I'm looking around at the universe going, there's kind of a lot of geometry and structure already being presented to us all the time, isn't there? I mean, everything is geometric. And then, of course, I came across this guy named Buckminster

Fuller. Let's give a hand to master. Buckminster Fuller, thank you, Bucky. Yes. Bravo. Bravo. Yeah. Bunkie fuller says any polygon with more than three sides is unstable, and only the triangle is inherently stable. And essentially shows how the equilateral triangle is the most stable structure in all of space. Now it would be another, almost 15 years later, that I'm building a course inside the resonance Academy with the sim Herman and William Brown and few other friends and Marshall Lefferts, who helped found my company with me, superluminal systems, pulls out a quote from Bucky that's on one of the flash cards related to this. This whole, his whole massive, you know, gigantic project, Bucky world, you know, Synergetics, in case you're not familiar with it, and on this little flash card, Bucky says Omni triangulated geodesic spheres consisting exclusively of three way interacting great circles are realizations of gravitational field patterns. The gravitational field will ultimately be disclosed as ultra high frequency, tensegrity, geodesic spheres, nothing else. And I about lost it, because literally, I've been describing the geodesic mechanic, with the pentagonal intersection as critical to seeing the equilateral structure of space, time, creating curvature, creating gravity. And I've been talking about it for over 10 years, and I find this quote from Bucky, and I was just like, Oh my God, dude already knew the answer, like, of course, he did somehow. And just to give you a picture of me 15 years before

that quote, This is me in high school. This is my project. I was really into Photoshop text effects. Can't you tell? I mean, I was like, let's bevel it, let's shadow it, let's do all the things. With it. But yeah, the fusion of science and spirituality. And you know, I was mapping the entire universe to the geometries of the chakras, showing dimensional progressions related to them, and relating each of them to properties and aspects of, literally, experiential field levels of the universe at different levels of scale. And of course, my favorite people in the world were like Lee Smolin and Brian Greene and Gordon Kane and Einstein and Bohr Barbara Ann Brennan. You guys know Barbara Ann Brennan's work? Oh, my God, she's so amazing. And Dan winter was another one of my favorites in those days. This was in the 90s. Yep, I'm that old. And this is essentially what I ended up coming up with, is this unified harmonic matrix to look at all these properties have to do with physical mass. All of this has to do with electricity and light frequency. All this has to do with molecular structures, and then through that to tissue structures, mental structures, solar system structures, you name it. This all has to do with information storage and genetic information relationships. This all has to do with the passing of information, communication of information, and then integration into a whole system, and then essentially into kind

of infinite recursion. Now, just to give you a little bit of a picture, because obviously, there's a ton here, and I'm not going to go into it. Isn't it interesting that the nucleus of an atom and a nucleus of a cell are the two most foundational objects, the nucleus of the cell, containing all the physical information for the body, the nucleus of an atom containing all the physical information for matter, right? And if you go up one level from there, and by the way, the body contains all the physical information for the personal suit of experience. And the earth is the macrocosm of our physical experience. If you go here, electrons around the atom carry the electromagnetic field that gives all the color and the light impression, and including our sense of the separation right from the object, the organelles around the nucleus of a cell interpret all of the chemicals in the body, which are what different electromagnetic vibrations to tell the body different things and to give The body different senses. And then how do we deal with that? Well, we have a whole electric, magnetic field around the body, right? And then around the earth. What do we have the moon? And what does the moon do? It regulates an electromagnetic, cyclical pattern around the Earth. Okay? So you can kind of see how this goes, and that each one of these work molecules are how we define structures. Tissues is how

the body defines structures. You know, art, etc. DNA determines how molecules store information, and so do the organs inside of our body. They take on purpose and put the tissues to work, right? And then eventually, chromosomes communicate DNA and our organ systems communicate within our bodies. So it's important to understand that what we're dealing with at a universal scale here is about a lot more than physics and forces. It's about universal patterns, and it's about connectivity between those patterns, and about how those patterns can give rise to the experiments and the things that we witness. Now, I'm going to come back to this later, but essentially, I was working on mapping how awareness and consciousness itself unfolds through a sequence in order to create the ability to perceive all of the things that are happening in the universe, right? And there's a way to do this that's actually quite simple. It's just a ray of creation. It's a dimensional progression. Now, I'm not going to go into that in detail right now, but it's, it's very interesting, because when you start to see that consciousness operates as a dimensional progression. It gives you a groundwork to start looking at how physics would operate as a dimensional progression, and how you can start with the most simple first principles of geometry and interaction. In other words, one is one and two is a relationship, right? Or one becomes two through time, that's a relationship over time,

right? And three, you now have the ability to observe change in time. You see what I'm saying. This is very first principle, and that's the way that I'm going to approach unifying the forces for you today. So I believe I've been integrating this kind of integrative thinking since 99 and essentially this is how I believe we can, you know, integrate all of the different forces through a unified picture. In order to do that, let's look back at the history physics a little. Bit again, we started with ether physics. That's all. There was the emergence of the study of fire. We had thermodynamics, the emergence of the study of Earth and matter and how things fall. We had the arising of gravity right. Then we started looking at air and water, and we started understanding electromagnetism, storms and lightning and all of that kind of cool stuff. And then eventually we started looking at space and time. And then it took the brilliance of someone like Einstein to say, it's not space and time, it's space time. And that took general relativity and special relativity to put together. And then you end up with this thing called the strong force. Uh oh, you know, we got a bond. Somehow bond these atomic nuclei together. So what the heck is going on there? And how do they actually work? Well, then you get essentially Nassim Harman proposing the Schwarzschild proton spin as the solution that links the

strong force and gravity. Awesome. Now you've got some other guys who proposed the electroweak force, and that's to connect the weak force and electromagnetism. But unfortunately, that can only happen during certain very extreme energetic conditions, right? And then finally, what we're going to look at is torsion physics. And torsion physics, I believe, is actually the key to this entire puzzle, and it's the thing that's going to actually pull it all together. So let's start first principles with the most basic thing, what is space time made of? And how does it work? If we go all the way down to the smallest scale, what we end up with is we go higher and higher and higher frequency, the smaller and smaller and smaller wavelengths of light. We finally get to a threshold at the Planck length. Now this threshold is really quite critical, because the amount of energy of the wavelength of light of that size obeys something called the Schwarzschild condition to the amount of space that it occupies. Now the Schwarzschild condition, this, this guy, Schwarzschild, came up with this amazing idea that at a certain threshold of a certain amount of energy versus a certain amount of space, you get a black hole. So this is the black hole equation, right? And what happens is when we get down to light at that scale, essentially what we theorize must happen is based on the energy of that wavelength of light to that space,

it must actually collapse on itself to a miniature black hole. Now this is hotly contested, right? There's plenty of you know controversy around whether this is true and whether this is the case or not. But it's very interesting that an entirely other area of people getting into physics and looking at black holes, and what's the smallest possible theoretical model for a black hole? Guess what? The smallest possible black hole is? A black hole upon length, length diameter. That's our theoretical idea of the smallest possible black hole. So whether you come from the electromagnetic side or you're coming from Black Hole equation side, you end up with the same result. And that is that at the Planck length, we hit a threshold in the electromagnetic field. Okay, now, if everything is made of these little, essentially bundled, Schwarzschild condition field components of light. Can think of them as like photons, but imagine now that this is a little tiny, self contained, energetic ball, and we know that the whole structure of space is full of energy. It's full of so much energy that we don't even understand how it's possible that it could have that much energy, right, as I talked about. So how could it? Well, it can have that much energy if the energy is all in equilibrium. So if it's all triangulated. If it's all essentially in balance with itself, then no energy is going to go out. And that's just basic thermodynamics,

right? Thermodynamics, energy is going to try to seek the lowest ground state. That lowest ground state, according to Bucky Fuller, if there are actually nodes to the structure of space, time they are going to triangulate period, point, Simple, 100% that's just basic logic. And this gives rise to the idea that space is this tetrahedral, hexagonal, scalar lattice. Now, I came to this in high school. Nassim also came to this in my early 20s. I saw things where he was posting about this, and that's how I got to know him, initially. And I started looking at, you know, his designs for this, you know, 64 tetrahedron matrix, and seeing this kind of structure. And I was like, but that's not complete. It's missing the pentagonal intersections, which allow curvature, Bucky, right? And so. So essentially, this a good way for us to think about her mains model of space time is to think of it as space time in its state of absolute zero, where there's zero entropy, right? So all of empty, empty, empty space is basically roughly in this this geometry, but as we know, every star, every galaxy, every planet and us, etc, we're all inside of gravitational wells. Therefore this is like platonic ideal, right? It's not actual, but it's pretty dang close, because at the Planck scale, everything is so small that for the most part, it does look like this, and that is how it staying in generalized equilibrium. But

in order to get mass and matter and all the things and all the experiences and all the worlds, we have to have curvature. We have to have this structure change. So what I'm going to show you is exactly how this equilibrium structure permutates, and thus then generates curvature, and thus then allows us to have things like gravitation. So if we treat these as vibratory fields, okay? So each one of these Planck diameter spheres are overlapping with each other, okay? And they're overlapping with each other, giving, of course, this beautiful rendition of the what, Flower of Life, right? The seed of life, which is a beautiful rendition that also, of course, is present just through triangular equilibrium. That's just what happens. You can make a lattice of triangles just by drawing circles. Draw a circle on its horizon, pick the connection point, draw another circle, and this is what you get. But I take this further and I say, well, actually, what we're dealing with is vibrational tensegrity between these things that Nissim likes to call Planck spherical units. So the vibrational tensegrity means that they're both they are both attractive, like a miniature black hole. They're sucking inward, right? But they also are vibrating and radiating outward, and because there's an equal balance of radiative vibration and attraction, you have a balance of push and pull, and that balance between push and pull is tensegrity. That's what Bucky was getting at, and that's how all

these structures can work. So you get this structure in total balance, and with that state of total balance. In order to get matter dynamics, what needs to happen is some one of those elements needs to radiate out, and when it radiates out, you get both rotation as well as you create what's called torsion, but through tensegrity on the field around that little pentagon. So just to give you a picture what that looks like. This is a geodesic. Here's the pentagonal vortex. Imagine that was a hex and it condensed to a five, and now what it's doing is it's pulling see how this right here, has six triangles, and this is six triangles, and this is six triangles. All these are sixes and these are fives. The five allows the pentagonal curvature to happen, and it creates a pole and a torsion in the structure around it. So what this starts to look like, and I'm going to get into this further as we go, what it starts to look like is that we can actually calculate the specific mathematics of the amount of structural dilation that's occurring to enable that fundamental unit of curvature to happen. And when we calculate that dilation that's going on here. Knowing how much energy essentially is in this field, we can calculate exactly how much energy is released by that distortion, and then we can actually see and understand the energetic properties of the proton. This is the trail

that I'm on. So keep in mind that this thing, when it rotates, as I said, that distortion field is creating, is creating a rotation and distortion in the entire field. And when that thing radiates out, it's not just going to like, there goes, you know, no, when one of these units of space time a Splunk spherical unit, as we're going to call it, pushes its way out through space time. It's literally going to push everything in its way. You can imagine the domino effect. OK, so now what you're starting to see is a whole field torsioning in, and a radiative line jetting out and. This is a natural component of the geometry of space when it's in curvature. In other words, anytime you're in a gravitational field, right? And what do we find at the center of gravitational fields? Big freaking stuff, stars. Are they radiating? Yes. Are they pulling and radiating? Yes? Planets pulling radiating? Yes, right? Stars, of course, more. But go down into a planet, tell me if it's not radiating something down there as you start to compress all of that matter together, oh, my God. It's crazy amount of intense energy, torsion, spin, etc. So you know, six is giving us the picture of this equilibrium state. Five is giving us the picture of this curvature. And then seven is really interesting. And 567, I was having all these dreams about them in high school, all these numbers, and I

was seeing them connected, and I used to draw them, draw a five point star into a six, and then connect that into the seven, you know, kind of thing. And essentially, what I realized is that the seven is the key to understanding how radiation creates propagation through the structure. Because when you add a seventh point into this six pointed lattice. We'll call it right. There are seven here, of course, but it's a it's a hexagonal structure. You see what I'm saying. When you add a seventh point into that, the whole structure has to move right. It's either going to move in a radial or it's going to move in a spin and rotation. And when it moves in a spin and rotation, essentially what you're talking about is creating a wave form that's going like this through space time interesting? Isn't that interesting? Isn't there some forces that might do that? Talk about that. So we know space time curvature is gravity. We know that, essentially, you know you're dealing with an equilibrium state. It's through very simple geometric permutations that you're leaving that equilibrium state and achieving different states of gravitation. This is all my work from back in 2013 and then Buckminster Fuller, of course, has mapped this exact same thing as I find tetrahedron pyramid five into the six of the equilibrium and back down and of course, shows the frequencies of geodesic mapping. So when we get back into the electron

or to the proton, essentially what we're seeing is we've got this field. It's rotating. It's creating a shearing at its event horizon around the equator. It's creating an upper torsion field that's pulling the space around it right, and it's creating a lower torsion field pulling the space around it. And we can look down inside of that structure. And eventually, if we go far enough down inside, this is what the geodesic will look like. And if we continue all the way down, we can get all the way to the core of the proton, and I'm going to show you that. And essentially, what this means is, if it's a geodesic, it has to have 12 major vector vortices around it. Now, why is that also interesting? Because on a geodesic, the 12 different pentagonal point positions are also in vector equilibrium from each other. So interestingly enough, the geodesic structure is, in itself, completely balanced and stable, the same way that the empty space time is. So it kind of makes sense that the two most sustainable normal things that exist throughout the entire universe are the proton, which is a geodesic and empty space, which is essentially hexagonal, right? That's it. And all of reality will come out of that. Everything comes out of that. And this is how. So we can see how there's this geodesic and it extends out and extends out and extends out, and it goes way out, because the number

of Planck lengths inside of a proton is massive. You can imagine that a Planck, Planck spherical units like a grain of sand. And you can imagine that the proton is basically the diameter from here to Alpha Centauri. Okay, so it's big difference in size, but the rules of geodesic curvature have to hold and so these rules get really, really powerful and really, really interesting when we start to unpack them, when we start realizing that there is an intrinsic vacuum, energy density, dilation going on around every one of those five sided points, as I was talking about before. So here you can see a very specific map. Here's the pentagonal vortex, and around it you've got the hexagonal structures, and you see how there. Gaps here it's because it's not in curvature yet, right? This is it in curvature. And so in order to be in curvature, these gaps have to close, and there tends to be distortion in the structure of the hexagon, if it has to go out a long way, rather than curve tightly. Okay, so that's the push in the pole that allows us to start looking at these equations defining the vacuum engine energy density and how much fall off it has from the polar region. We can also look at the displaced PSU and their distance from the central defect. We can start looking at the strained vacuum energy, etc, etc. And like I said, I'm not going to go

deep into mathematics, but I want to show you that this is what I work on, understanding the strains and the structural geometry and the force dynamics going on inside the proton to understand how this applies to the rest of physics and the rest of the universe. So we already use these principles in the dome. And this little geometry is really fascinating. And it's worth mentioning here that when we look at this little pentagonal geometry and we look down into this kind of geodesic vortex, there's a couple ways that it could go the little pentagonal layers as they go down, could be aligned, or they could be inverted. And one of the ways that I was building this with little geometries is with an inverted so it's an upward Pentagon, and then behind that you have a downward one, right? And they go back and forth. So it looks something like this. It's a decagonal view. As you look down the pipe. Imagine you've got a tunnel into the proton, and you can see down that tunnel into its structure. Well, what does that geometry look like? I started going, Wait a second, if, if the protons pentagonal vortices are decagonal, that's exactly what DNA looks like from the top. And then I started thinking, Well, what if there's some information storage correlation going on here? Because in a lot of my earlier work, I show how there's a natural correlation between molecular structures forming DNA

and their ability to store information, right? So there's something to the geometry here that's letting it store the information. So I started mapping, like, the output sequence from the Dodeca to the inputs. And like, how is it that this structure actually could essentially, you know, receive and transmit information? And it gets, actually, pretty obvious. You look at the protons geometry, you see these 12 vector vortices. You see the polar vortex, the spin speed decreases as you go up, as I talked about, and now you've got inputs coming in through the polar vortices, because the thing's spinning around those polar vortices, right? So they're the most stable pipeline for energy and information to curl into the structure, and you have the greatest torsion around the top and the bottom. So, you know, it's like a drain. It's literally creating torsion down into the proton. Now you also have outputs, and the outputs are what goes into the core and what comes out of the core. So is it that Protons have a CPU, like a central processing unit that's, we call a singularity, is that what's actually at the center of black holes is actually like a link to some kind of higher level of processing. I don't know. I'm just going to leave that one with you. And you have these output lines, which can be the energy and the information coming out through the other 10 vector vortices of the proton, because there's 10,

there's five in the upper hemisphere and there's five in the lower hemisphere. And guess where the electron orbitals happen to be? Well, isn't it interesting that there's a certain pattern of electron orbitals that happen to also line up with some of these geodesic positions. And if you think of these as balls spinning together and CO spinning, you start to see how that works. And the core of the proton, of course, is of great interest and fascination to me, because if you follow that geodesic structure all the way into the very nucleus, what you end up with is what we call an excavated dodecahedron. Now it's possible that that excavation point, these points in here that are going in, you see those that those are actually dilating in and out, because it's a passage where energy and information is traveling, and if it's traveling like that, then you get this sort of Jitterbug effect that Bucha used to talk about like the thing is breathing right now, yeah, and pulsing. So if it's pulsed out, we call it a pentachus dodecahedron. If it's pulsed in, we call it an excavated dodecahedron. And why is this also so interesting? Well, if this is the Planck length, this. Is the Planck length. All of these are the Planck length exactly from each other, right? Because these are, or these are fields pushing and pulling to each other, as I showed it before. Well, guess what? The inter points

here. There's an icosahedron of inner points, and that little icosahedron is sub Planckian. So we know we're now past the threshold of the electromagnetic spectrum. And why can we call it a singularity? Because what happens at the center of a sphere you get to what zero curvature, by nature, it's a point infinite curvature. Now, is it still classically from a definition, curved at the icosahedral structure? Sure. But now you're sub planking. So we don't even have, we don't even have an eight. We don't have, we don't have any way to define definitively Speaker 4 a plank length. It cannot be divided, right? So you've been showing clock length division, yes. So define sub plank length Exactly. Adam Apollo There's no way to do it. All we can do is philosophize that there is another layer past the edge of the electromagnetic spectrum as we know it, and past the edge of what we think of as the scalar limits of the universe. Now, of course, we've come to the limits over and over again, somebody and you know, Nissim right now in his scale paper, he's proposing sub plankian stuff, right? This is one of the things he's working on, too. But for me, it's one thing to kind of leap to the idea that there's sub plankian stuff, and another thing to model geometry that we know is self referencing and actually quite effective at describing the physics of space. And you get to

the core of it, and you're like, wait, it's going so plow key, because now you're actually modeling where that can come from. And interestingly, a little bit of a synchronicity along the way is that if you look at this geometry, the pentagonal geometry, a lot of you know this. If you rotate this geometry 360 degrees right, and then you rotate it to one notch past 360 degrees. So you do a sequence rotation, in other words, orbit, and then go one step orbit, and then go one step orbit, and then go one step right, what you end up with is 432, degrees. And if you start to look at these counter rotating pieces going through the proton, and you start to look at them in this way, how many steps does it take to get through the whole rotation and to one permutation in the next layer, like, how do you get to the next sequence? Right? Turns out it takes 13 steps to do it. Well. I thought that was really interesting. And I started realizing, Wait a second, in DNA, what you tend to have is essentially in the whole codon complex, you have 64 different codons, and four of those codons are stop units. Now that means you have how many five sets of 12 plus one plus one plus one plus one. Okay, interesting synchronicity, right? And so I was like, Wait, there's another connection here to DNA structure that's really fascinating.

So then, you know, you start to consider, okay, you take 13 steps to the 432 rotation. Well, gosh, 432 what a freaking crazy, powerful number to be looking at anyway, because there's 432 4.22 times 10 to the 17th, you know, seconds in the age of the entire universe. Now notice that the 432, is on this end right of the number. That means that's going to be that way for a long time. It's been that way for a long time, right? This is like fascinating that we're at this age of the universe now. It's also interesting. There's 13 moon cycles in a year that 432 times 200 is the moon's orbital speed in kilometers per day. 432 times 2000 is the sun's equatorial diameter in miles. 432 43,200, divided by two is the earth's circumference in nautical miles. And 432 times 200 is the number of seconds in a day. I mean, that's just interesting, right? I think of that as pretty interesting. Like, we talk in science a lot about like, Oh, that's a cool synchronicity. Or no, we say, what a coincidence. Yeah, I think we're looking at a little more than coincidence here. And when I saw this, what this led me to, I was, of course, on the trail of, is the proton an information storage system, right? That's what I'm looking at. Can the proton store information? Yeah? So and I see, of course, the age of the universe. And I'm

like, wonder what that is in Planck seconds, since we're dealing with Planck units, well, it turns out the age of the universe in Planck units in Planck time is 8.77077 times 10 to the 60th. And I was like, Wait, did they say 10 to the 60th? Because basically, when you take the event horizon size, the measured size of the proton, you divide it into Planck spherical units. It turns out there's 10 to the 60th Planck spherical units inside of one proton. So there's the same number of quantum bits Planck spherical units, you could think of as a quantum bit, one bit of the structure of space, right? And you take 10 to the 60 of those, and you get a proton. Does this mean that the proton is growing with the universe? Maybe the lifetime of the universe and the lifetime of the proton are synonymous. Wouldn't that make sense? And of course, Nassim, you know, he'd already published quantum gravity in the holographic mass. He's like, Oh, there's definitely a mass energy correlation. And he was thinking about about the pressure on the inside to the surface, and how that must match the pressure and the energy relationship of the whole universe. But to me, that was a little bit abstract. This is a little bit more direct. To me, you're talking about a vibratory bit and a second in the universe, and there's a correlation between the two. And it's actually a correlation

by a factor of eight. There happens to be one PSU generated every eight set, every eight plunk seconds. That would be the exact, exact match, right now, 111, bit. Every eight seconds. Again, synchronicity, because I'm like, wait, the I Ching is made of eight trigrams, but the I Ching is also a map of the 64 hexagrams and IE, the 64 codons in DNA. Okay, information is happening here. So you've got eight times 10 to the 60th correlating to the eight trigrams. Eight times eight is 64 Uh huh. Okay. And then we're looking at the proton core, 12 times five. This is 12 times five. There's 60 right. 60 plus four gives you the I Ching and DNA. And this is, this is a visual spectral map of the I Ching and DNA that I produced long, long time ago. I made a spectral translator for the I Ching because I wanted to see it in colors rather than just the bars. So I can see if there's patterns. Oh yeah, baby, there are patterns. It is ridiculous. You notice that every one of these you go to red, you have a perfect spectral circuit, purple, blue, green, yellow, orange, back to red. The orange one bridges to the orange sector. The yellow Bridge is the yellow sector, and so on and so forth. It's freaking insane. It's insane how perfect it is. And everything is matched with its polar opposite, white and blue, orange and

black, exact complementary opposites, right? The whole system is ridiculously, ridiculously perfect, I mean, to the point of like the Great Pyramid of Giza, ridiculously perfect. And you guess what? There's four very special color combinations, only four. Every other set has eight. But these four are different, and those four are the infinite Yang and the infinite Yin and the balance of infinite Yang over infinite yin and infinite Yin over infinite Yang. In other words, if you are speaking in the I Ching language, Heaven over heaven, earth over Earth, Heaven over Earth and Earth over heaven. So these four directly connecting to the idea of the four stop points in DNA. It's just, it's just too good to be true. You know, it's just too freaking magic. So I wanted to leave that one with you, to take with you, because it's pretty exciting. So back to the proton. What we're dealing with here is a universal hard drive. It's a hard drive protons are taking in and storing IE and are growing as the universe grows, and they're growing as well as exchanging data with the universe around them. Now, if it's true that the proton is hairy as some of them might. Modern physicists like to say right meaning that the surface of the proton has the potential for wormholes to extend off of it, micro wormholes to entangle with other things and other protons. Then we must postulate that the smallest possible wormhole link

that could exist off of a proton to any other particle would be the size of one of the PSU, one of the Planck spherical units, if that is the size, that means that every proton potentially can be entangled with up to 10 to the 40th other protons or things in the universe, right? 10 to the 40th connections. That's a lot. Now, if you think I'm just blowing some steam up your butt, there's this thing called er equals. EPR. How many people are familiar with that idea? A few people in the room. Okay, great. So er is Einstein? Rosen, ie, e Einstein. Rosen bridge. IE, wormhole, right? You guys familiar with this concept. So wormhole connects two points in space time instantaneously, meaning that outside of traveling through the space, their energy and the information are connected directly, directly. Now, EPR is Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen. Einstein and Podolsky and Rosen came up with this whole thing around entanglement. And the idea is, Einstein called it spooky action at a distance. But the guys never really thought that the two could be the same, because one is happening in the arguments in the quantum camp, and the other one is happening in the arguments in the special and general relativity camp. And you got to keep in mind that back in those days, these were very separate camps. Einstein tried to, you know, cross between them. A few of the guys tried to cross between them,

but they were pretty separate. But now, basically, in 2013 Leonard Susskind and Juan maldacena proposed that this could be the same thing. And this has been taken a lot further by guys like John Wheeler. John Wheeler, by the way, wrote the book on gravity that you'd get in college. Do you know the book gravitation? It's like a massive book. You can kill people with it. I mean, it's insane. And so John Wheeler goes on to say, well, what if, what? If all of space time is actually made of these micro wormhole networks, and maybe protons are hairy and they're actually interconnected with tons of other things with these little, tiny micro wormhole networks? Well, I think that that's absolutely correct, and I decided to take a look at what the implications of that are for our general life experience and our day to day world. So what's going on when we're just like sitting around in nature? What's happening when we're just chilling, when we're just talking to people? If everything is made of light, then there's many levels of frequencies that we're observing and that we're also not observing, but a lot of the layers of frequencies are going on down close to the Planck scale, and there happens to have been people through time and history and in different traditions that talked about the light inside the body isn't isn't there, right? So just for fun, I'm going to, instead of just rendering,

you know, an anatomical human body, I'm going to render a human body with light systems going on inside of it, right? Because maybe there are very small frequencies down close to the Planck scale, happening in the structure of space time, where these kinds of structures are actually operating, and we just can't observe it yet because we haven't learned how to see that fine of wavelength. What if chakras and nadis and the etheric field layers and the human energy body layers are actually fully detectable in very, very fine gravitational waves, in other words, space time, they are. I hear somebody say, I mean, I know it is because I see them and my I have to be able to see and interpret something that's actually happening and occurring in space time. And if nobody could see it, and nobody would have it, it was all just an imagination. Well, that'd be a different thing. But people see it, perceive it, use it for healing purposes. Ie Barbara and Brennan, which everybody clapped about. So essentially, if we get into this, what we end up seeing is that their number of atoms in the human body is around 6.5 octillion. That's from Suzanne Bell. Number of protons in the human body around 10 to the 28th that's Jefferson labs. The number of wormhole connections per proton potentially is up to 10 to the 40th. That's based on the quantum gravity and holographic mass model. And the number

of Planck time units in a single second is around 10 to the 44th so how. Many connections or data bits, could your entire body transmit andor receive and connect to some other source, internally, andor externally in one second? The answer. The answer is around 1.23 times 10 to the 113 that is, that is around, probably the theoretical maximum. You know, I've said to a lot of people, because when I first ran it, I written the calculations a little roughly, and I came up to 10 to the 111th roughly. But if you account for the fact that the equator around the proton may not be connecting in that way, because it's in a light speed shearing state, right then, you know 10 to 100 and 11th is not a bad way to put it. And in any case, this is a maximum. So that means that there, if we translate that down to a language, we can kind of understand, how many people understand, you know, megabits per second, like your computer, has you familiar with this term? Okay? So, you know, you get a big movie, it's going to be like five gigabits, right? That's like 5000 megabits per second. Right? Essentially, so essentially. Now, if you look at the fastest computer internet system on the entire planet, the fastest recorded system on the planet is around 26,000 megabytes per second. Right, 26,000 megabytes per second, right? Well, this is 1 trillion trillion trillion trillion

trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion megabytes per second. That kind of makes sense. I mean, if you've ever done, had a spiritual experience, done some psychedelics, smoke, DMT, you're like, Oh, my God, I can process a lot of information at the same time. Like, you know, you ever like the dream where you, like, fall asleep, and you're asleep for five seconds, and you're in this whole long dream world, and then you get woken up, and you know, it's like seconds later, you know, you snooze your alarm, and you have an hours of long experience. 10 minutes have passed, okay? Our information processing is ridiculous. Now, if we go further with this, and we say, All right, this is how much the body can exchange with itself. A lot of this is going on internal information exchange, by the way, it's got to be. And you look at the number of stars in the entire universe, well, I mean, you realize that, basically, you can entangle the all the stars in the entire universe in like, one proton, one of your game, you know, one proton in your body. And if you connected every proton in your entire body to a different star in the universe, so you link them all, you're going to only use like 161, one to 10 to the 61, of your bandwidth. This is just insane. It's just like, that's a lot. Yeah, it's, it's, if you I wrote

a thing about this, imagine a single grain of sand. Now imagine all the beaches on earth. Now imagine all the sand in a trillion earth like planets. That's pretty hard already, but still, that's not enough. Now you picture all the sand of a trillion galaxies each filled with a trillion earth like planets, and we're not even close. So you have to imagine all the sand in a trillion universes each, and containing a trillion galaxies with a trillion earth like planets, each with as many beaches as we have on Earth. And the ratio of one grain of sand to the rest of that sand is roughly equivalent to one to the 10 to the 61 this, this number right here. Okay, so you get the picture. We are freaking crazy engines, aren't we, and if we go deeper and we start really looking at this mechanically, well, what's really going on we are this massively entangled light network of information linking a bunch of protons together in the coherent whole that makes up the human body, right? And what's going on is that our brains are trying to capture the hologram of our entangled experience with everything around us and inside of ourselves and captured into a biological freeze frame, or data stream that essentially represents the hologram of the actual information that we're exchanging. And it also means that, you know, essentially, we are in an entangled interaction with everything around us and everything. We're

perceiving all the time, everything. And it's not like, weird. It's not like, Ooh, you're touching me right now. Like, no, we are in a field, and our fields are exchanging information. How else is it possible that you could have a thought over there in the room and I pick up on it, and I say something, and I speak right to what you're thinking, how can I do that? How has this happened with speakers? How does this happen with comedians? How is it that a kid goes out and skins their knee and the mother feels it right? It's because we are entangled. And when you're dealing with something like a child, it's literally a biological structure that came out of another body. So its entire cellular structure is entangled until it replaces itself in seven years. And what happens by the time the kid is age seven? I don't care, mom. Bye, you know, before that, they're like, Mommy, I need your entanglement with me, right? This is what's happening. And so essentially, what we're seeing is that there's a pattern of energy. And the last time I spoke here, I talked about this, and I talked about how it's possible that entanglement is just self similarity of vibration in two different regions of space. So if there's self similarity, in other words, if there's already a lot of shared proton growth, right, or shared information exchange in a network, then that network is going to

have a high likelihood of entanglement to another network. In other words, if you spend a lot of time with somebody, you're going to be more likely to have more entanglement with them, and thus more instantaneous information transfer is going to go on between you two, consciously or unconsciously all the time. Unknown Speaker Make sense? Adam Apollo And of course, you know, we can always hearken back to the powers of the days of Willow and say the connection to the universe is in which finger. I thought it was my own finger. It's like that was the correct answer. It is the power of the whole universe does exist in your own finger. So what about the electron? Right? We talked a lot about the proton. We're dealing with this spinning sphere. It's torsioning space time. It's a semi crystalline structure in high tensegrity, and it's twisting space, right? And as it twists space here, it's basically pulling around space time. So you can imagine this, like whole field is creating a torsion vortex in the structure of space, and this torsioning field has a specific fall off at certain distances, and that is what we're going to look at as being the electron field. And how can we actually check this? How can we see if the electron fields are actually following the rotational spin and torsion of the proton? Well, first we got to see that why this is happening. So the protons rotation is

a torque vector, so it's going inward as it spins, and directly against space time would be a pressure vector, right? This is where you get the time dilation differences we talked about, because it's rotating, it's operating differently with the mass energy dilation. And now, if you start to look at each one of the protons as a little spinning ball, which is a really interesting and very classical way to look at it, you realize there's only certain configurations that the proton can bond with other protons, and those configurations are on the hemispheres, or cubic hemispheric. But if you start doing equatorial, you start ending up with really, really sensitive break points. Let's look at this another way, just to make it a little bit more clear, this is a bond in the poles and the polar regions are high torsion and low speed, right? If this is C, this is way, far less than c, as I'll show you, that means high high connection. Now on the hemispheres, you also have the potential for bonds. There's also high torsion, right? But when you get down to links that are on the equator, you have very, very low torsion to near zero, because essentially, there's a shearing going on where the two protons are traveling at light speed. They have no bond at that place. But as soon as you leave the area where they're traveling at light speed and they're traveling less than light speed, now

you have extreme torsion forces starting to come into play, so you still have some bond there, but the dilation gets less and less. This is all inverse, right? Is inverse from pressure vectors make sense because you're dealing with rotation and. And centripetal force. So basically, the strongest bonds you get are going to be polar bonds. And we can see that from the proton rotation speed, exactly how and why this happens. You've got speed of light at the equator. This is the speed curve going to the polar vortex. By the time you get to the polar vortex, you're getting all the way down to essentially relative local speeds. At that point, you're talking 0.00000, many, many, many, many, many, zeros. You know point one or one, two meters per second speed at that point, right? So when you get all the way down to the polar vortex. You talk about one Planck length out from the polar vortex, you're getting to 2.877 times 10 to the 12th negative 10 to the negative 12 meters per second. So it's still fast, considering that you're going one times 10 to the 23rd Planck lengths per second. But it's very, very slow when you consider how many Planck lengths per plunk time you're moving right and so you're we're still dealing with a massive speed difference here, okay, between what's going on at the equator and what's going on down in the polar regions and what is really happening

at the equator. Well, if we zoom in on this equatorial horizon, what we see is essentially like if we looking at this as the map of what's going on inside of space time as its structure. Well, at the point of light, speed shearing, where light is going on. It's essentially operating like this, like they're disconnected. It's like an event horizon. It's like a zone where you basically create a bubble, where now you have no influence on the surrounding space. How do we know that that's the case? Because what anything that's going see, anything that's going the speed of light has zero mass and has zero experience of time within itself, right? In other words, this is the key to why the proton lasts forever, and it's why it's so strong and so stable, because it's literally like a tiny little spaceship, and it has figured out how to create a bubble that isolates it in space time. So you've got this region of shearing at the equator, increased torsion, decreased mass dilation, and you have increase of of of torsion as you go down towards the poles. And that gives us an electron field guide. Now, if we start looking at the electron fields, we can start to see that the torsion is mostly happening around the polar regions, and we can start to propose dynamics and experiments. Does this work? Well, you take polar deuterium, which basically is one proton, one neutron and one

electron. And by the way, I kind of rearrange things a little bit here, but, but essentially, this is where I'm going to show you why the weak force doesn't exist at all. There is no such thing as the weak force. It's not about a beta decay. There is no weak force. And here's how we know this. And also, by the way, there's no neutrons. So take everything you learned in elementary school that there's neutrons, throw it out the window. What you have is a proton and a proton. In the standard deuterium model, you have a proton, a neutron an electron, no, you have a proton and a proton, but they are co spinning. And what happens when things co spin, you have what's called conservation, conservation of momentum, of charge, of energy, etc. In this case, it's conservation of charge and its conservation of spin. And with this conservation occurring, these two protons can act like one proton. They are torsioning about the same amount of space time as they would if they were by themselves. Does that make sense? Now? Helium, which is two protons, zero neutrons and two electrons, is extremely unstable, and we think of it as two protons, which means that the two protons are operating independently enough to torsion more space time and move more electrical energy, ie, more electrons. And whenever this one breaks apart, we don't notice anything. Nothing's released spontaneously, crazily, right? It's already in an unstable,

radioactive condition, as it releases some of that. Existing radiation just comes off. They're already a crazy storm, because this thing is pulling around itself. This one's pulling around and trying to feed it through there. It's very unstable from just a geometric, classical engineering mechanics standpoint, right? And so essentially, if we look at this as equatorial horizon shearing because it's traveling the speed of light right here you have a minor bond just from this region and this region pulling together. But we know that, according to theoretical calculations, helium two, this object would be much, much more stable if the strong interaction, as we think of the thing that's bonding them together had been only 2% greater. I'll tell you exactly what the difference is. The difference that little tiny 2% that little difference in bonding energy. It's the horizon shearing. It's that equatorial spin point where that bond between them is actually broken. The gravitational field between them is weakened at that point where it's shearing space time. You guys following me, is this making sense to you? Pretty Unknown Speaker well, energy device, Speaker 5 a proton. Well, the helium two example. Oh, yeah, yeah, interesting, yeah, absolutely, Adam Apollo because they come apart really, really well. Now, on the other hand, when there's one proton and one neutron, what we know is that that must actually be two protons in polar alignment, because now they're both spinning, co spinning. They're not bonded at that

shearing point, and they're going to co move the field around them. And guess what? It's a super, super strong structure. And what happens if you break this structure? If you break this structure, what you get is beta decay. And during beta decay, you release an electron, you release an electron neutrino. And essentially, you know, we say we they come apart. And it's like, what happens to the neutron split seconds. I mean, there's like, literally milliseconds, and the neutron becomes a proton. Neutrons never exist outside of the nuclear bond. Now, what makes more sense to you that there's these things called neutrons that secretly only exist while they're bonded inside of an atom, and we never actually have any way to measure or know that they exist, and they must exist, but they they just happen to like, when you separate them, they're like, No way, not a proton. Like, does that make more sense? Or does it make more sense that they're actually just protons sharing conservation of energy, and when you separate them, we get an energy release, and that energy release is what we are essentially designating as a decay of one of the protons to a neutron, you know, or the one of the neutrons to a proton, right? What if the energy release is actually just the release of the bonded energy between the structures themselves? That's what I'm getting there. And of course, if you look at electron orbitals, they're

pretty odd, aren't they? You got all these weird things and little balloons coming out and extensions of little balloons. And one of the projects that I'm working on is essentially a modeling where you take balls that are protons. They only have two really strong bonds. They also have a weak bond, if they bond at the equator, and you stack those balls, and you start to correlate groups of these little proton balls to the types of electron clouds that we see. Now, nobody understands why the electron cloud is going to spin some electrical energy just in this one region, but if you have a proton nucleus that's extending out protons into a couple different bubbles out this way, then it makes all the sense in the world, because now you're looking at the proton as the source of the torsion that's causing the electron field to go there. Now you could look at that in, you know, mechanics, as we stand right now, in the standard mechanical model, and say, Well, maybe electrons gather in these regions based on the positive charge of where the protons are, right? But the picture gets a lot more interesting when you think about it as the proton spinning and the electrons following suit. Now this also opens up a whole nother layer and a whole other wormhole here to understand the electron, because one of the things that people don't really get about the electron is that we think

of the electron in we think of wires, right? And we think of wires as essentially being traveling electrons. But that's not the case. They are not traveling. They are essentially oscillating. Okay? They're oscillating. It. And if you ran a wire between, say, this projector, and you ran that wire all the way to the moon and all the way back, and then plugged it in, you would think, we'd have to wait for the second where the light is going to travel, or, let's say, to the sun and back right you'd have to wait for it to get there and come back. But that's not what happens. What happens is the second you plug it in, the projector comes on like the moment, the instant you plug it in, and that is because the energy that's traveling is not traveling through the wires to power the projector. I a luggage. And if you're wondering if I'm making this one up, this animation is from PBS. Okay, so basically, what's going on is the electrons are oscillating. In other words, the structure in the molecular field is oscillating. The crank is this shared field of electromagnetic energy that's oscillating and bouncing through the proton structure. OK, so the protons are all spinning. Electrons are the field is being pulled and torsion around. And what goes on is it's just sharing a field. It's sharing a co moving field, and that field looks like it's oscillating, because it's rotating

around these nuclear cores. And what's actually happening is, around that little field, the whole space time field, is propagating the wave forms of that movement. So the whole field itself is what's actually transmitting the power. And the power transmission, even in alternating current, right? Alternating current goes in and out, back and forth, the field is always going direct. In other words, the energy flow from where you plug in the source to the projector, no matter how long the cable is, it's the field that's actually end up powering the thing. We just don't think about it this way, but this is what's really going on. We are fields. We are wave fields propagating. And doesn't that make this a little make a little more sense what happens when you oscillate. You add PSU to the whole thing, the whole thing oscillates, and it creates a ripple, and that ripple is moving through the whole field to the conclusion of what goes on in space time. And there's a lot of interesting ways we can also look at this. I mean, you know, if we want to be really exaggerating. We can imagine the whole field of space time like, right, but it's much more subtle than that, right? And you can also think about it as like rotary passages, you know, where one thing is rotating and it's tumbling and passing a rotation to something else. And this is the way that energy is moving and

propagating through the field of space time. And while this is a pretty unlikely scenario, I really love this rendering, so I wanted to show you guys, but this is what a co moving field grid looks like if you're dealing with like a tetrahedral, oscillated field. So all these pieces, all the parts of space time, co moving and CO operating. Now as we start to tie all of this together, because I'm coming to the end of my time here. Essentially, we have to realize that the little tiny frequencies and the little tiny wave forms that we're talking about down at the Planck scale, and, you know, all the way up to the proton scale, and then all the way up to the electron scale, and then all the way out to molecular scales. Are just just, you know, the lower points in the octaves, they're just really high frequency octaves. We can follow those octaves of frequency all the way up to the size of waves that are the size of galaxies. So the size of waves that are size of galactic clusters all the way up to essentially a theoretical limit, which is the wave form that is the size of the diameter of the entire universe itself, right? And if we do that, what we start to see that these are ripples of PSU at every scale, right? So every major phenomena or event is a co moving field of space time, operating in

a certain classical sort of you could call it like hydrodynamic. Hydrodynamic is a really nice way to think about it, because it's kind of like liquid, but it's kind of like a solid, right? It's holding itself in position, but it's also super fluid, meaning that it can change position because it's light, it's light, but it's light that's held by its own pressure of vibration. Should pull and all it takes is the right kind of mechanics through that structure, and the whole thing is an instrument that's playing. Now we can go from here and start to look at how certain really powerful technologies are developed out of this. For example, quantum entanglement as a source for communications. Right now, we're essentially taking pieces on the ground. You know, this is the LI Jiang ground station in China, and they were able to teleport, essentially quantum entangling, teleportation of information and communications over 1200 kilometers, instantaneously. That's the extent of our quantum field communications right now. But this was a while ago, so you better believe that these systems are already well up and running. This is a long time ago that this was started. And if we start looking at the fact that we are a quantum processor capable of entangling and communicating information with any other point in space time that we put our awareness on. Essentially, I think that it's actually the lens of consciousness that drives the entangled field. So if I focus

on a particular place or a particular object or a particular thing, I am actually steering the field of my whole body's entanglement to interact with that thing more IE, I can get more information about it. I can divine it. I can even astrally infinite you split it into everything, and. Thing, you realize that everything and nothing are balanced by energy. Energy is the exchange of the everything and the nothing, right. Then what happens? You get creation and you get destruction, right? And what happens when you interact between creation and destruction, it's hot and cold. So what happens is you get spin and you get charge and hot, cold, spin and charge. Good luck describing anything in the universe that doesn't fit those. That's really the fundamental forces. Now these go on to operate into functional models that we're very familiar with. Water encodes information. Check out the work of VEDA Austin, unbelievably epic work. She takes petri dishes, sets them on a photograph, freezes. It takes five minutes to freeze. It. The ice captures the image. Ice is photographic, like water is photographically recordable. It remembers space. This is what I'm talking about. The protons are storing the information. You just need a way to actually display it. Earth is the integration. Ice, right? The solidity. Solids, water, liquids, solids, air changes. Gasses are the forces of change, of swirling, of harnessing fire, forges. You know, it creates things. And we can take that further

into a whole model, where we start to realize that this is our physical world, this is our emotional world, and this is our mental world, and that everything that we are is an evolution of the ray of creation expressing itself out through the most fundamental principles that slowly evolve and elaborate and elaborate and elaborate and elaborate and interact and mix until we get this insane complexity that we're experiencing. And I'm working on mapping this all the way out that's 10 levels deep. And as you can see, there's really cool harmonic patterning that comes from this. Another way to look at this simply is just through a harmonic series of balls going the same speed, traveling around nested polygons. And what do you see in this music? 5341, to the Fibonacci to the one right, and then one splits eventually and four and three and five, you're moving through the harmonic series, right? That's all it is. It's all just harmonics. It's all evolution of self awareness. It's all who and what we are. And that, I believe is the point where I'm out of time. So thank you guys, so so much. Thank you. Appreciate your time. Just a couple of post notes. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you so much. Transcribed by https://otter.ai travel to it by moving my perception and awareness and getting information, such as, for example, with the class that I did with this crew, one of the places you didn't

mention that we went to was Machu Picchu. And when we used to travel to Machu Picchu, I had never been there, but we went on one travel, and one of our students went down and saw this place down that was like, kind of underneath the ground, under a massive portion. And they saw light inside of this place, and that it was like a special, magical place. Well, it turned out that my friend Brittany had come back from Peru and come back from Machu Picchu, and said, Oh, no, that place actually exists. It's called the Cave of the moon, and it exists in Machu Picchu. And of course, when I went to Machu Picchu, I went there, and I went under there, and I went into the space, and I was like, this is really trippy. I mean, it was really interesting, just visiting places that I had never been before. But I had chosen to travel to astrally with my mind with other people, to test our level of capacity. How much information or data can we get about these sites, and then how much of that can I confirm in person? So this really opens up the boundaries of what we think of as the boundaries between science and these metaphysics for spirituality, the reality is that the world and the existence of the structure of physics that we live in is so fantastically amazing that we're just barely scratching the surface at how

beautiful and how powerful it actually is. So here's what's happened to our whole very divided physics model. We now have taken torsion physics. We recognize that all of these are part of one simple, unified process, that it all actually comes back to ether physics, and it's all in balance with itself, and we start to have a new kind of model where it's very, very simple. There is no strong force that's gravity. And space time is flowing. Curvature of gravity is causing any kind of micro force all the way up to macro force, as long as we're accounting for mass and time dilation and things like that. And oscillation is electric. And in other words, all electromagnetics are from the warp and the weave of the structure of space itself. So space time is a lattice of light that's interconnected, that can curve around itself. And when it does that, it causes gravitation. There's torsion, spin, gravitation and curvature. And anytime you have any kind of curvature, any kind of structural change, you're going to have oscillation. And when you have oscillation, you have the electromagnetic field. And therefore all of gravity, all of space time, the whole shebang is basically gravity and electromagnetism. That's it. And it's not even that they're separate. It's that gravity is electromagnetic. It's just that it's electromagnetism at a macro scale, through the structural dynamic of space itself. And when we really start looking at this, it's really just a

series of very fundamental properties that we're talking about, which is expansion, contraction, rotation and crystallization. And interestingly enough, this just happens to match with my big consciousness map work, because if you take the